Malboros pipe
15 years ago
Which is better? |
Captivat3d
15 years ago
Love can last forever. |
Mimi Angel
15 years ago
Love is better,it's more deep and sincere. |
Brittany Paige
15 years ago
I agree that in a relationship you need both. |
Malboros pipe
15 years ago
But technically Lust come first, so in that case wouldnt it be better |
Malboros pipe
15 years ago
I think your going off the point here. Lust has to come first, cause if you see a girl/ man at a party and u think to yourself they're very good looking i wish i could be with them.LUST.. |
Captivat3d
15 years ago
But some people don't even experience the LOVE part. Some people just go after someone just because they're good looking and want something from them. Once they get it, their feelings don't go beyond lust. |
Malboros pipe
15 years ago
Ah but because Lust comes first doesnt it have to be better than love |
Captivat3d
15 years ago
Just because something comes first doesn't make it better. You don't neccesarily need lust to love someone. You love your parents once you were born. You don't NEED lust for love to happen. Love happens on its own. Love conquers all... |
Malboros pipe
15 years ago
Your completelty going off the subject. Lust isnt the exact opposite of love. I would never insist that slavery is better freedom. Freedom overcame slavery, sure look at us on this site, we have the freedom to write more or less, what we desire. Lust only ever comes into play when u desire to be with someone that u are sexually attracted to, not your parents. thats in a different category of love like maternal and parental. |
Captivat3d
15 years ago
I didn't know that we were ONLY talking about sexual relationships. I thought just in general... |
forevertobeart
15 years ago
Wouldn't it suck if you had no lust for the person you love? ^_^ |
forevertobeart
15 years ago
I didn't say lust came before love, I said they were both important. And if it's an older couple, it's quite common not to have sex. What I meant was it would suck if I got married, say at twenty years old, and loved my partner so much, but had no lust, and no sexual attraction to them. I suppose I was just trying to be funny. I was never good at that. ;) |
Captivat3d
15 years ago
No, you bring up a good point because I think to be with someone you have to be attracted to them in some way. Either looks or personality..or whatever! |
Malboros pipe
15 years ago
I actually think love is better. and for the reply message for"rubberlips" |
Malboros pipe
15 years ago
The only people wo say sex is overrated are the people not getting it. but agree with u love is better than lust, but at the same time in certain relationships lust is as important,maybe not in the case u are talking about. |
Beautiful Chaos
15 years ago
"The only people who say sex is overrated are the people not getting it." |
Beautiful Chaos
15 years ago
For me I think of it as a progression Britt, when you first meet and spark, that is lust, you are trying to satisfy a need this person has brought out in you, then it turns to passion, where you wish to satisfy them and then hopefully love comes into play and you satisfy each other. |
Beautiful Chaos
15 years ago
"why does everything have to be associated with a sexual attraction" |
Malboros pipe
15 years ago
For rubberlips, this is the definition of lust |
Beautiful Chaos
15 years ago
You only took the first two in the definition, lust applies to things outside of sex. |
Captivat3d
15 years ago
Lust doesn't have to just apply to sexual attraction. Humans desire many things outside of sex like the post before me said. |
Malboros pipe
15 years ago
Love is better hands down |
Hopeless Romantic
15 years ago
Love has always been better i think.... |