Rahl The Layman Lord
18 years ago
|
Agreed. |
Rahl The Layman Lord
18 years ago
|
It's fairly simple really what I mean by my comment. By my definition of 'truly living' is by putting purpose to ones life. That doesn't have to be complete, or entirely thought out but there has to be some reason for existence. Other wise we are nothing more than wasted potential, we are meaningless beings walking around to no end. That is not life as I see it, and that is what i try to avoid. I don't have to know exactly the purpose of my life but I try to put every small purpose to it that I can, some being larger purposes such as my happiness. |
silvershoes
18 years ago
|
:) |
Rahl The Layman Lord
18 years ago
|
I seem to complicate things for the sake of complication haha. I find it amusing many times or insightful in others...and then there are those times where I complicate something, I get to the end, and I ask my self...why the hell did I just do all of that? |
silvershoes
18 years ago
|
Jason, you just like talking about yourself. Period. |
Rahl The Layman Lord
18 years ago
|
Reverse psychology jane? |
silvershoes
18 years ago
|
The four of us should group hug. |
Rahl The Layman Lord
18 years ago
|
I see nothing wrong with this. I second the motion. |
Rahl The Layman Lord
18 years ago
|
Later all, the clock strikes one and this one needs must hit the sack. |
silvershoes
18 years ago
|
Much is odd. |
silvershoes
18 years ago
|
Professionally found. |
silvershoes
18 years ago
|
Will do. |
silvershoes
18 years ago
|
Since shutting up apparently is not preventing my finger movements, I would like to point out that which you may or may not know: There is no hyphen in profound. |
silvershoes
18 years ago
|
Yes, I assumed originally you meant it with verbal intentions. Just making sure ;) |
NuovoVesuvio
18 years ago
|
Haha, Darwin and Abby, you are amateurs! I have been dealing with fools in these forums for over two years. One of the first things I learnt, is that fools are illogical, and you cannot in any way battle that; you could solve Fermat's last theorem all over again and they would rebut you with something completely irrelevant, hence Darwin's first post. |
Italian Stallion
18 years ago
|
time for a new thread... |