The Poet’s Due

by ddavidd   Jul 18, 2019


To explore the possibilities of words
is not the poet’s due.
Even voyaging in the world of meanings
is just a share of their dues.

The poet’s due however
is exploring
in the worlds of imagination
and heart!

To be in touch with heaven
in the famine of fair and virtues,
to be aqueous
in the world of objects,
to excavate through the words to
oxygen,
through rocks to
the light!

While
the deities of science
draw their mathematical portions
of aesthetically applauded formats
to sketch the exact blueprint of beauty
Poets are ones
who find beauty in imperfect,
wholeness in ruptured.

Ones who blow the breath of life,
draw the shade of soul,
the colours of life
the dye of death
and inoculate the rainbows
to blindness,
and dance
to the carcasses of
toneless substance.

3


Did You Like This Poem?

Latest Comments

  • 4 years ago

    by Mark

    Love to read this on the front page!

    • 4 years ago

      by ddavidd

      Thank you, Mark. It worth even more coming from you,

  • 4 years ago

    by Ben Pickard

    I agree with the essence of this piece, Bob. I also believe that a poet is due an awful lot of heartbreak and misery which is the balance they must pay for finding so much beauty (more perhaps than others) in so many things.
    One point - "who find beauty in imperfection"? Not sure.

    Anyway, I'm nominating this one because I truly understand it,

    • 4 years ago

      by ddavidd

      "who find beauty in imperfection"? Not sure.
      Most likely because perfection is only assumed, it is not real Because then after time would stop because there would no progress after perfection unless the perfection itself is relative.

      Thank you so much ben for the compliment and your time. Also the nomination.

    • 4 years ago

      by Ben Pickard

      lol, Bob. No, I understood, but I was pointing out a possible typo. You have written 'imperfect' and I wondered whether you meant 'imperfection'. Also, the nomination is a pleasure.

    • 4 years ago

      by ddavidd

      Okay, I got you. I meant imperfect ( objects) rather than the act of imperfection. They both mean the same thing but the points of emphasis is different, I suppose.
      Thanks again

People Who Liked This Also Liked